MelodyIlliterate Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/16/waco ... ative-djs/We've been patiently waiting for Wacom to officially announce its upcoming Intuos4 tablet (recently caught by Mr. Blurrycam), so were were totally caught off-guard when the company instead unveiled a sort of foray into the music biz, a digital DJ interface destined for release in time to hit Japanese and European clubs this summer. It's called the nextbeat NXT-1000, a device with a plethora of knobs, buttons, and a small LCD for controlling samples, plus a touch-sensitive pad that seems to act as a turntable and a fingertip drum machine in one. That pad actually pops out, maintaining a wireless connection to the base and enabling fleet-footed DJs to show some moves off-stage while still dropping beats -- assuming their cans are wireless too. No word on cost at this point, but can you really put a price on that sort of musical freedom?I think im leaning towards the side of retarded due to:1. why would you run around and try to mixB. Dont know about you guys but i need 2 hands to mix... therefore cant run around and mix unless i ran to another table :Siii. Headphones connect to base of player... so either... 1.5 m radius of running around doing stupid shit... or shitty wireless headphoneswhat do you reckon? Quote
Jaz Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 Looks retarded, seems like more of a hassle than it's worth Quote
mattus123 Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 seems ridiculously unnecessaryalso dont trust a touch pad jog wheel Quote
AlexJ Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 while i think this is cool, i agree it is really unecessary and hence, quite stupid. Quote
Cupe Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 i wouldn't mind a wireless setup just so I didn't have any cordsbut not sure of point of thing in OP Quote
SolDios Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 if used anywhere public:1.Buy portable signal jamer for $302.Get close to stage3.????4.Profit? Quote
MelodyIlliterate Posted May 21, 2012 Author Posted May 21, 2012 lol nice solcan you reiterate cupe?.. what just the connections between your mixer to your sources?or... Quote
Tomy Posted May 21, 2012 Posted May 21, 2012 seems alright. cons with wireless platter - to far away from mixer for volume / eq- you hardly have to touch the platter these days everything is a 128- it'll look boring- the only plus i found was floored and that is being able to scratch out in front of the crowd but again your miles away from the x-fader. what would be awesome is if they did it with a bank of like 5 hot cues. Quote
Cupe Posted May 21, 2012 Posted May 21, 2012 can you reiterate cupe?.. what just the connections between your mixer to your sources?or...yea i just mean the cords between everything. It'd be nice not to have to deal with thatit would also eliminate the no. of decks from a mixer etc.you'd just be buying a mixer with ports instead of inputs and could setup like 10 decks on a mixer and shitin conclusion, wireless all the things Quote
russell Posted May 21, 2012 Posted May 21, 2012 - you hardly have to touch the platter these days everything is a 128maybe/probably I'm being thick here but what do mean by this? Quote
Mitch Posted May 21, 2012 Posted May 21, 2012 he means most songs he plays are 128bpm, so you just hit play for those tracks Quote
russell Posted May 21, 2012 Posted May 21, 2012 he means most songs he plays are 128bpm, so you just hit play for those tracksthats what I thought..... Perhaps Tomy doesn't have much variation in BPM range but I'd imagine most people will, therefore there probably will be a need to touch the platter.life would be boring if everything was 128bpm after all Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.