Narukami Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 Gentlemen, if you were the same people who "help choose between two CDJs" are readin this, then I am here to inform you that there could be some changes to the plan. Most of you fine young (?) lads told me to choose this:https://www.storedj.com.au/products/PIO-PK-CDJ350-1But after watching some of the footage from NAMM I may have some changing of the minds:http://thedjhookup.com/numark-mixdeck-quad.htmlPre-order. I've calculated the costs off shipping and whatnot and say that this whole unit would cost me $1133.50 . But I've heard that Numark looses sound quality at high volumes :l but this is 4-in-1 awesomeness that's also 1000 bucks cheapers. I am in needing of your opinions Quote
andyman Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 That looks tacky as shit imo.Go the 350's, you wont regret the decision. Quote
Jaz Posted January 24, 2012 Posted January 24, 2012 CDJ's would be better, and that site is for a pre order...are u sure it even posts to you? Quote
Narukami Posted January 24, 2012 Author Posted January 24, 2012 yeah it does, i've checked (even the postage company) well i gues this is kinda a dumb question to ask anyway.BUTI still wanna know if Numark loses sound quality at high volumes (not if the gain's at max, just like if the knob points at somewhere around 1 or 2 o clock) Quote
Mitch Posted January 24, 2012 Posted January 24, 2012 All in one systems generally have an inferior build quality, due to using cheaper parts and not the same level of quality control.Cheaper parts = cheaper sound cards used = inferior sound quality overall at all volumes Quote
SourceRaver Posted January 24, 2012 Posted January 24, 2012 CDjs or at least wait till the Numark has been released and road tested. A friend of mine bought an American Dj midi console when it was first released and it had (and still has) some major bugs. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.