CDJ1000 vs CDJ2000 BPM Accuracy

[mattus123]

Hey just wondering how the 2000s compare to the 1000s in terms of detecting bpm.

I know they display it more accurately by showing 2 decimal places, but A little curious about detection

My reason for asking is that I'm going in a dj comp so ill need to mix fast, which basically means ill be relying on the bpm reader a bit more than usual. I know some of my tracks show different bpm readings at different points in the track on my 1000s, which doesn't bother me. What concerns me more is that the 2000s will be more accurate and show a more consistent bpm, which I won't be used to

For example, right now track a is at 140 bpm and track b is at 140 but the CDJ displays it as 141, I account for that knowing that reading of 1 over is accurate, but this will throw me if it isn't the same case with the 2000s. Hope that makes sense

Cheers fellas

[GREMM1S]

If the tracks are put through Rekordbox they will be more accurate than cd's on CDJ1000s.

What i noticed is that Rekordbox isn't as good as i thought.

If you want to be spot on use BPM analyzer and write the bpm's down.

[mattus123]

Ah k, but the 2000s will be reliably inaccurate aswell?

[legunner]

2000s are nearly perfect all the time in my experience. I rekordbox everything.

[Mitch]

if you are using cds, they will have similar accuracy to the 1000s. Possibly a bit better.

If you are using usb's analysed through recordbox, they readers are incredibly accurate

[GREMM1S]

Ah k, but the 2000s will be reliably inaccurate aswell?

Rekordbox makes heaps of difference over non analysed files.

As i have previously dicussed with mitch, the reading you get on a 2000 is the same one from rekordbox analysis, ie it doesnt read it on the fly like 1000s do.

I would actually say 2000s and all new players are slower at reading cds.

[mattus123]

That's sweet thanks boys

Ill run it through rekordbox and use usbs as planned, and trust the read out I guess

It's at times like these I wish I had 2000s

[Hobberz]

2000s are nearly perfect all the time in my experience. I rekordbox everything.

THIS

[mattus123]

2000s are nearly perfect all the time in my experience. I rekordbox everything.

So after using the same tracks on my 1000s and testing them on rekordbox/2000s ^this^ is defiently true