not forgetting the "mash-up", "re-edit", or in live music the "cover" version. it is a massive grey area in djing but in the live music scene publishers get a simple payout which allows bands to cover songs live under the venue license. To release a cover they have to have permission and probably a contract that agrees to share income. I define bootlegs as "pirate copies" so are 100% illegal and probably funding terrorists. generally apart from "bootlegging" i think all djs should be encouraged to play with stuff (i.e. do re-edits, remixes, mash ups, re-workings etc) and play it out and let people enjoy their creativitiy, but if they start making cash or a rep from it they must in some way respect the original composer and share the wealth if there is any. If they dont they deserve to be sued for their theft of intellectual copyright IMO. however if the punters lap up any old shit like cbg says melbourne does... well then to me that means it's time to go underground again. The true headz will find/ follow the true sound and the best scenes are always born in the underground.